|
Name: exact55 •
Title: Are there any photo's or descriptions of the bones? •
Date posted: 03/01/07 5:03
|
Q: Are there any photo's or descriptions of the bones from 1980 when they were re-buried ?
The boxes together with some schoolboy fantacy statistics is hardly convincing and the DNA testing is irrelevant. Something more substantial is desperately needed to make this claim even vaguely feasible.
|
|
|
|
Name: Xare •
Date: 03/01/07 5:47 |
|
A: Well Iam hearing rumors that there was no bones, just some leftover dust that they used for DNA analysis.
|
|
Name: Xare •
Date: 03/01/07 5:54 |
A: I mean this documentary better come out with some more information on this other burial site.
When the story first hit the news they were saying Bones were found and now its like they are back peddling saying they were moved.
They were making a big deal about it at first and then the story changes.
its called HYPE !
|
|
Name: OpenMinded •
Date: 03/03/07 2:05 |
|
A: Skulls were found, if I'm not mistaken, and carbon like ash. I think they were saying that the bones could have been moved by the disciples at some point, before resurrection, as to hide his body and that could be how/why his reamins (could have) ended up in the tomb.
|
|
Name: Schwar3Kat •
Date: 03/03/07 6:06 |
A: In fact there were bones in the ossuaries, but these were removed and re-buried in unmarked graves.
One might imagine that had there been any evidence of crucifixion then the bones would have become very significant.
Other ossuaries from the period have been found with crucified remains such as 'Yehohanan, the son of Hagakol' which was well documented because of the evidence of crucifixion.
The lack of documented evidence of crucifiction while not conclusive, definitely implies that the Talpiot box did not contain crucified remains.
|
