Name:MorDeKhai •
Title: Circus Show •
Date posted: 02/27/07 20:40
Q: They claim to find Jesus' Tomb. They say archaeologists, forensics experts, statisticians, etc. have COME TOGETHER to decipher "one of the greatest mysteries of all time"
sounds more like a circus advertisement to me.
Look at the motives...Follow the money...Do your own research, believe me there are tons of debates, theories, findings...you name it. The truth will reveal itself, no one will have to go digging it up.
I have a Question:
WHY, IF YOU SAY YOU PAY ATTENTION TO CLOSE DETAIL, DO YOU HAVE ON A WEB SITE INTRO PAGE A CLAIM THAT "An incredible archaeological discovery in Israel changes history and shocks the world. Tombs with the names The Virgin Mary, Jesus of Nazareth, Mary Magdalene and Judas, their son, are found and an investigation begins."
HUH?
DID YOU SEE THAT
"...Tombs with the names The Virgin Mary, Jesus of Nazareth, Mary Magdalene and Judas, their son, are found..."
OK...THEN WHY INSIDE THE SAME SITE IT SAYS;
"Ossuary 80/505 was inscribed “Maria” – a Latinized version of the name “Miriam,” rendered in Hebrew letters. AND Ossuary 80/500: “Mariamene e Mara” – “Mariamne, also called Master”
BUT WAIT THE INTRO PAGE SAID "...The Virgin Mary..."
AND "...Mary Magdalene.." NAMES FOUND
HOW MISLEADING (TISK TISK TISK)
Oh...and if this were a court of law (and since they use legal nomenclature)
CREDIBILITY is something you need. I found a little dent in that armor. I'm sure with your own searching you will find some too.
I HEAR THERE IS A RESEARCHER WHO WAS AT THE ORIGINAL DIG IN 1980 WHOM DISAGREES WITH CAMERON/JACOBOVICI
2Pe 3:2-4
"I want you to remember and understand what the holy prophets said long ago and what our Lord and Savior commanded through your apostles. First, I want to remind you that in the last days there will be scoffers who will laugh at the truth and do every evil thing they desire. This will be their argument: "Jesus promised to come back, did he? Then where is he? Why, as far back as anyone can remember, everything has remained exactly the same since the world was first created." NLT
2Pe 3:9
"The Lord isn't really being slow about his promise to return, as some people think. No, he is being patient for your sake. He does not want anyone to perish, so he is giving more time for everyone to repent."NLT
Repent! (makers of this film)
For the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
A servant of Jesus Christ
-MorDeKhai
Name:MorDeKhai •
Date: 02/27/07 23:55
A: Read For Yourself !
(no hyphens in link)
http://www.haaretz.com/-hasen/spages/823215.html
(1- hypen between "bib" and "arch" and 2 underscores)
http://www.bib-arch.or-g/bswbOOossuary_Uzi_Dahari.pdf
(n-o- hyphens in link)
http://www.archaeolog-y.org/online/features/jesus/-
Name:BeanSidhe •
Date: 03/01/07 0:32
A: Let him who is without sin cast the first stone,
let me ask are you without sin?
cause if you are, then I will listen
Name:MorDeKhai •
Date: 03/01/07 5:11
A: My friend, If your going to quote Jesus, please do it right.
John 8:7
So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, "He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her."
I am a sinner saved by grace and set free from the bondage of sin.
John 3:18-21
"He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For everyone practicing evil hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed. But he who does the truth comes to the light, that his deeds may be clearly seen, that they have been done in God."
A servent of Jesus Christ
-MorDeKhai
Name:Jokaanan •
Date: 03/04/07 14:09
A: Er...actually (according to these archaeologist guys), "Mary Magdalen" and "Mariamene" mean the same thing, as do "Mary" and "Maria". If you'd read the articles, you would have known that. Of course they had to make "Tomb with the name Mary found" the headline because regular people wouldn't know the signifigance of "Tomb with the name Maria found".
And by the way, the argument about which of you is more free from sin/Bible-knowledgable is really rather amusing. Kind of like...
"He's MY personal Jesus!"
"No, goddamnit, he's MINE!!!! I saw him first!"
sorry. it just is.
Name:anne •
Date: 03/06/07 2:07
A: But wait the ring master of the circus said..."Bring on the elephants!!!" For those of you who rather see in perfection the grey beasts...then see them...for those of whom see the light,, see it!!!!!!!!The beast with inwill give you a number that number will be the beasts!!!!!!!!!!So fight over your tombs and diggings, but I will fight for Christ
Name:fabulous1 •
Date: 04/24/07 14:07
A: Mor
1st Are you from the South?
2nd-Why would the Son of God need is body in Heaven? It's beyond me why Jesus would take his whole body to heaven when he, as we are spritual beings.
3rd the names, names and words are tranlated. If they would have said "maria" or Mariamene", we would have not known who they were talking about. You seem a little slow. Think about your questions-FYI, you are judging them. You are not being Christ like.
Name:morcomm •
Date: 05/15/07 7:39
A: """Let him who is without sin cast the first stone"""
We as Christians have a right to defend our faith. The act of defending your faith against heresies is called Apologetics.
Also we as Christians are washed clean by the blood of Christ and thus are without sin in the eyes of Jehovah.
I agree with MorDeKhai on this. I believe that Cameron has taken it one step too far. Can't get the sub off the side of the boat - put a hole in the side of the boat, that should work.
Want to prove God wrong, find the slightest bit of evidence that just might.
Mr Cameron, What about the enemy attestation to the empty tomb and the fact that faith in the resurrection took root in Jerusalem? Jesus was publicly executed and buried in Jerusalem. It would have been not possible for belief in His resurrection to take hold in Jerusalem while His body was still in the tomb where the Sanhedrin could unearth it, and the put it on public display, and thereby expose the hoax. Instead, the Sanhedrin accused the disciples of stealing the body, apparently in an effort to explain it’s vanishing (and therefore an empty tomb). How do we explain the fact of the empty tomb?
We know that the disciples could not have stolen the body because they would have then known that it was a hoax. Remember that they where persecuted and suffered greatly for this very belief, the core belief of Christianity. Why would they have not spilled the beans? Under torture surely they would have? Remember that Nero used to illuminate his garden parties by burning the bodies of Christians, would someone not have spilled the beans?
Mr Cameron, this is your website, why don’t you join the discussion and prove to us that what you say is true?
