|
Name: vampyrex •
Title: Other tombs •
Date posted: 02/27/07 13:58
|
|
Q: So now what do we do with the other sites that the Church says mark where he died or was buried?
|
|
|
|
Name: followingchrist82 •
Date: 02/27/07 16:25 |
|
A: I love the line of questioning here. You act like you've wrapped this up and it's a indisputable fact. Good grief, listen to yourselves! What arrogance. You found a tomb with the most common names of first century Judea and said that is Jesus Christ's family tomb. And it's because YOU say so? Oh please. What do we do with the other sites....what nonsense. Grow up.
|
|
Name: Tara •
Date: 02/27/07 17:09 |
A: The site where he died on the cross does not change...that is where he died. It is believed he was moved from the frst tomb to protect his body, so the first tomb could still stand as an important place.
The church would never debate where is remains are because they believe there is none, so this find does not affect the history of the other sites.
|
|
Name: BeanSidhe •
Date: 03/01/07 0:51 |
A: I love the line of questioning here. You act like you've wrapped this up and it's a indisputable fact. Good grief, listen to yourselves! What arrogance. You found a tomb with the most common names of first century Judea and said that is Jesus Christ's family tomb. And it's because YOU say so? Oh please. What do we do with the other sites....what nonsense. Grow up.
and you act like your not a sinner how interesting the only one arrogant is you
|
|
Name: Panluna •
Date: 04/05/07 16:15 |
|
A: They just might have to face the facts and accept them.
|
